Thursday, August 31, 2023

A Note on William Carlos Williams’ Poetry (Part-II)

 

  

 


 

 

The first book of poems (1909) by Williams was conventional and correct in sentiment and diction. In his second book “The Tempers” (1913) his style was imagist in feeling though it was still romantic and allusive. In his third book “Al Que Quiere!” (1917) Williams applied the imagist principle of the direct treatment of the things rigorously. 


Webster Scott said that “Williams was an immensely complicated man…. He was the complete human being and all the qualities of his personality were fused in his writings.” Williams emphasized that poetry should focus on objects and not on concepts. It should move away from abstract characterization of things. Poetry should create visual images and should be tangible or observable.

 

 According to him ideas exist in things since images create an idea of the object and gives it a meaning. To Williams, poetry was a means of gaining access to social realities. It is also an instrument for imagining the future, a shared life free of alienation and exploitation. He wrote,” The outstanding character of poetry is that it cannot exist other than as the revolutionary attribute of a free people.” His early poems shared a number of aesthetic concerns of his contemporary writers especially that of Ezra Pound in conveying imagery through textured language. His early interest in Nature marked the influence of Whitman and Keats. His later poetry was brief, pointed and deceptively simple with complex meaning.


 According to Randall Jarrell, Williams in his writings demonstrates that “he feels, not just says.” His lifelong quest is that poetry should mirror the speech of the American people. He sought “a language modified by the American environment. He sought to express democracy in the language and thought materials of America expressing his point of view. William stressed that poetry must find its primary impetus in local conditions. Richard Ellman and Robert O’clair called him “the most important literary doctor since Chekov, with a deep sense of humanity.”

 

In 1914 his first son, William G. Williams was born who later became a physician like his father. His second son was Paul. H. Williams. Williams was very much interested in painting and this influence is seen in his poetry where he used realistic imagery with clarity and simplicity. As a doctor he practiced during daytime and wrote at night.

 

Williams was influenced by Imagist movement through his friend Ezra Pound and Hilda Doolittle (H.D.). But soon he formed his own opinion different from theirs. In 1920 he published his experimental book “Kora in hell: improvisations”, one of his favorite books. According to Webster Scott, it is an extraordinary combination of aphorisms, romanticism, philosophy, exhortation combined with a few elements of obscenity and reverie.  Pound called it “incoherent” and “Unamerican” and H.D. considered it as “flippant.” Wallace Stevens also complained about the poet’s tantrums. But Williams defended his stand and was determined to continue the advances he had made in American poetry.

 

 In 1923 he published “Spring and all”. In this seven- stanza free verse poem without set rhyme and metrical pattern, he describes the sad state of the society at the end of the World war I. But the poet hopes that the world may enter a more promising future. William believed that change or transformation is not an instant process and it takes time to evolve. Williams wanted new poetry to be based on everyday speech formed by imagination rather than on any metrical compulsions and rules. His poetry differed from that of poets like T.S. Eliot and W.H. Auden who were conventionally technical in their approach.

 

 In 1922 the publication of Eliot’s “The wasteland” overshadowed Williams’ concept of poetic modernism. Williams wrote, “It was a shock to me that he was so tremendously successful.”  He criticized Eliot’s highly intellectual style with its frequent use of foreign languages and allusions to classical and European literature. According to him T.S. Eliot was conforming to rules of classroom English whereas the modern poets are breaking the rules.

 

 In “Spring and all” Williams viewed the same American landscape as Eliot did, but interpreted it differently. Williams’ poetic task was to affirm the self-reliant, sympathetic consciousness of Whitman in a broken industrialized world. Unlike Eliot who described the harsh realities of the world, Williams saw his task as a break through restrictions and generating new growth. The real function of imagination is not to avoid reality but to affirm reality most powerfully. In his later works, his verse grew shorter, more austere and more pointed. After 1923, Williams did not release another book of poetry for ten years. He wrote prose dealing with America.

 

In “The American grain” he tried to examine the founders of the American history. He gave a succinct definition of America and its people. In his “Voyage to Pagany” based on his travel to Europe he assessed the world through the eyes of an American. In short story collection “The knife of the times” dealing with and the depression, he blamed the inadequacies of the American culture for both the economic and emotional plight of American people. In his trilogy “White Mule,” “In the Money,” and “The build-up” he dealt with the problems of an immigrant family in American society. He won national Book Award for his third volume of “Paterson” and “Selected poems.” In 1953 he got Bollingen prize for his literary achievements. William’s last book “Pictures from Brueghel and other poems” won Pulitzer Prize in 1963.


 “The desert music” and “Journey to love” are considered as mature works of Williams. According to Kenneth Rexroth the “Desert music” is an explicit statement of the irreducible humanness of the human being. In this book the poet presented simple, indisputable with calm maturity.” In his poem “Asphodel, That Greeny Flower,” an elegiac epithalamion, the poet confesses his infidelities to his wife and asks for forgiveness. He seeks new life on the verge of his life. W.H. Auden praised this poem as “one of the most beautiful poems in the language.” In the love poems of “Journey to love” the poet presents vignettes of daily scenes in his characteristic rhythms and language. In his poem “reflections on death” he writes that love and imagination are the essence of life. He who loses them is as good as dead. In his play “A dream of love” Williams dramatizes his belief in the conflict between man’s need for emotional renewal in love and the woman’s need for constancy in love.


 He preferred colloquial American English and a humane approach to portray the conditions of the contemporary society. In his modernist epic collage of place “Paterson” in five books (between 1946 and 1958), he gave an account of the history, people, and essence of Paterson, New Jersey. He examined the role of the poet in American society and summarized his poetic method in the phrase “No ideas but in the things.” In his preface to “Paterson” Williams wrote that “a man himself is a city beginning, seeking, achieving and concluding his life in ways which the various aspects of a city may embody … all the details of which may be needed to voice his intimate convictions.”

 

In “Paterson” he explored the myth of American power. He revealed the mixed results of success and industrialization which resulted in creation of widening inequality and city slums. William chose Paterson, New Jersey as the prototype of the American industrial community. He preferred a society of useful manufacturers with competitive energy and moral stamina to lift the burdens of the common citizen and raise the living standards of people with social and cultural benefits. According to Breslin, “The Wasteland” is a kind of anti-epic in which the quest for meaning is entirely thwarted and we are left at the end waiting for the collapse of western civilization. “Paterson” is a pre-epic showing that the process of disintegration releases forces that can build a new world confronting the savagery of the present society and affirming a creative future. Breslin thinks that Eliot’s end is Williams’ beginning. Williams completed five books and he was planning to write sixth volume before his death. “Paterson” was criticized for its mosaic and loose structure with alternating passages of poetry and prose. Yet it is considered as an “Ars Poetica’ for contemporary America. Breslin thinks that “Paterson” has a thickness of texture and a multi-dimensional quality which makes it seem difficult sometimes, but gives a rich and intense experience. Later poets like Allen Ginsberg, Charles Olson, Robert Lowell and Denis Levertov recognized Williams’ greatness and “Revolution of the word” and acknowledged “Paterson” as the modern “Leaves of grass.”

 

 His poetry influenced many literary movements of the 1950’s—the beat movement, the San Francisco Renaissance, the Black Mountain school and the New York School. He had close friendship with Allen Ginsberg, another poet from new Jersey. Williams included several of Allen Ginsberg’s letters in “Paterson.” One of the letters of Ginsberg inspired Williams to write the fifth section of Paterson.” Williams also wrote the introduction to Ginsberg’s book ‘Howl and other poems” in 1956. Williams suddenly had a heart attack in 1948. His health deteriorated with many complaints. He spent some time in Hillside Hospital, New York. He died in his sleep on March 4, 1963. He was buried in Hillside cemetery, Lyndhurst, New Jersey. William’s poetry as a modern poet will be remembered for his precious contribution to the American poetry for its simple language, portrayal of common people in America, and his focus on imagery.

                                          ***************

     31st August 2023                               Somaseshu Gutala

No comments:

Post a Comment